Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Nikola Tesla - an aeroplane without wings that doesn't fall out of the sky

The treatment of Nikola Tesla by the restrictive powers of the so-called FREE MARKET (otherwise called the Commercial Espionage Mechanism) truly makes me sadder than sad.

I want to state right up front that the content for this revelatory post can be found on the TESLA SELECTED WRITINGS part of the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BOOKS website.

This entry's about Tesla's simple 'rotary engine' PUMP or TURBINE and how it can be used to make AN AMAZINGLY STABLE FLYING DEVICE that doesn't suffer from the design flaw of aeroplanes, which is to fall out of the sky when hitting air pockets. He patented this in 1913...

TESLA'S NEW MONARCH OF MACHINES
by Nikola Tesla
New York Herald Tribune,
October 15th 1911

“I have got more than that,” replied Dr. Tesla. “I have an engine that will give ten horse power to the pound of weight. That is twenty-five times as powerful as the lightest weight engine in use today. The lightest gas engine used on aeroplanes weighs two and one-half pounds to the horse power. With two and one-half pounds of weight I can develop twenty-five horse power.”

“That means the solution of the problem of flying,” I suggested.

“Yes, and many more,” was the reply. “The applications of this principle, both for imparting power to fluids, as in pumps, and for deriving power from fluids, as in turbine, are boundless. It costs almost nothing to make, there is nothing about it to get out of order, it is reversible—simply have two ports for the gas or steam, to enter by, one on each side, and let it into one side or other. There are no blades or vanes to get out of order—the steam turbine is a delicate thing.”

I remembered the bushels of broken blades that were gathered out of the turbine casings of the first turbine equipped steamship to cross the ocean, and realized the importance of this phase of the new engine.

“Then, too,” Dr. Tesla went on, “there are no delicate adjustments to be made. The distance between the disks is not a matter of microscopic accuracy and there is no necessity for minute clearances between the disks and the case. All one needs is some disks mounted on a shaft, spaced a little distance apart and cased so that a fluid can enter at one point and go out at another. If the fluid enters at the centre and goes out at the periphery it is a pump. If it enters at the periphery and goes out at the center it is a motor.

“An aeroplane driven by your engine?” I asked.

“Not at all,” said Dr. Tesla. “The aeroplane is fatally defective. It is merely a toy—a sporting play-thing. It can never become commercially practical. It has fatal defects. One is the fact that when it encounters a downward current of air it is helpless. The “hole in the air” of which aviators speak is simply a downward current, and unless the aeroplane is high enough above the earth to move laterally but can do nothing but fall.

“There is no way of detecting these downward currents, no way of avoiding them, and therefore the aeroplane must always be subject to chance and its operator to the risk of fatal accident. Sportsmen will always take these chances, but as a business proposition the risk is too great.

“The flying machine of the future—my flying machine—will be heavier than air, but it will not be an aeroplane. It will have no wings. It will be substantial, solid, stable. You cannot have a stable airplane. The gyroscope can never be successfully applied to the airplane, for it would give a stability that would result in the machine being torn to pieces by the wind, just as the unprotected aeroplane on the ground is torn to pieces by a high wind.

“My flying machine will have neither wings nor propellers. You might see it on the ground and you would never guess that it was a flying machine. Yet it will be able to move at will through the air in any direction with perfect safety, higher speeds than have yet been reached, regardless of weather and oblivious of “holes in the air” or downward currents. It will ascend in such currents if desired. It can remain absolutely stationary in the air, even in a wind, for great length of time. Its lifting power will not depend upon any such delicate devices as the bird has to employ, but upon positive mechanical action.”

“You will get stability through gyroscopes?” I asked.

Through gyroscopic action of my engine, assisted by some devices I am not yet prepared to talk about,” he replied.

“Powerful air currents that may be deflected at will, if produced by engines and compressors sufficiently light and powerful, might lift a heavy body off the ground and propel it through the air,” I ventured, wondering if I had grasped the inventor’s secret.

Dr. Tesla smiled an inscrutable smile.

“All I have to say on that point is that my airship will have neither gas bag, wings nor propellers,” he said. “It is the child of my dreams, the product of years of intense and painful toil and research. I am not going to talk about it any further. But whatever my airship may be, here at least is an engine that will do things that no other engine ever has done, and that is something tangible.”


You know the big kicker in all this - Tesla's description of his VERY STABLE IN-AIR DYNAMIC MANEOUVRABILITY FLYING MACHINE sounds a lot like the reports of UFOs people have been reporting since the 1950's. Methinks Nikola Tesla should have talked about the secret stabilising device for his 'rotary engine' flying machine A LOT MORE. In 2010, a patent was issued for a wind turbine based on the Tesla design. Gah, it's all so sad, the technological advances that mankind has let slip by in the name of Commerce - it makes me physically SICK the missed opportunities for a Free Planet humankind has plagued its 'evolution' with.

HERE'S A MODEL OF ONE, IN ACTION: fairly impressive

No comments: